Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley has asked his Democratic counterpart, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, to give a list of anyone besides panel members or staff who could possibly have gotten admission to committee-only records on Supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Grassleys request to Feinstein charged that Democratic staff gave one senator accessibility documents subsequently member didn’t show up on an appointment to see the records. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who isn’t about the Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday tweeted that he or she had viewed Kavanaugh documents via the standard channel designed to senators.
Story Continued Below
Grassley’s request to Feinstein comes amid a weeks-long battle over Kavanaughs voluminous paper trail from his five-years within the George W. Bush administration. Democrats have loudly protested the GOPs continuing development of Kavanaugh whose confirmation hearings are set to start Tuesday without getting a complete discharge of his Bush-era records, with well over 140,000 pages of records about the nominee remaining limited by committee members and staff.
Its that tranche of committee confidential documents who has sparked questions from Grassley precisely the Democratic side within the aisle is managing usage of Kavanaugh records. Grassley wrote to Feinstein that only one senator who made an appointment with my staff to examine documents never appeared to the appointment, and then he added that previous staff-level requests for particulars on access granted by Democrats to non-Judiciary members and aides have gone unanswered.
I have therefore become concerned about how Committee Confidential documents are going to be handled, Grassley wrote to Feinstein on Tuesday. As We’ve explained time and time again, these documents might have highly sensitive information including security information which might be very damaging if released that federal law excludes from public access.
Grassley has responded 19 separate Democratic missives raising questions his handling on the Kavanaugh nomination within the last five weeks, personally addressing his minority-party colleagues on various components of the documents flap. The most up-to-date Democratic pushback on Kavanaugh documents, sent Tuesday, originated in all 10 minority-party folks the Judiciary Committee who lamented that the vast majority of the documents which we would want to use on the [Kavanaugh confirmation] hearing remain cordoned-off as committee-confidential.
An estimated 287,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh records from his time as Bushs White House counsel happen to be publicly released thus far after being screened by way of a team led by Bill Burck, the former presidents records representative, in combination with 430,000-plus pages that remain accessible at a committee-confidential basis, as outlined by a Judiciary aide.
Grassleys office has never yet received an answer for your letter, according to a panel spokesman.